Can We Talk About Duplicate Listings and Cluster Tag Spam?

Discussion Forums General Zazzle Discussion
1

The marketplace is getting flooded with near‑identical listings  same titles, same descriptions, same tag clusters, same artwork  sometimes “new” only because something was moved a fraction of an inch or the background changed from white to ivory. It makes search results feel repetitive and pushes down genuinely creative work.

Using the same artwork on a pillow or mug? Totally fine  that’s cross‑merchandising. But uploading the same invitation twenty different times with the same title, same description, same tags, and the same artwork… just because the paper color changed, the age changed, one more candle was added, or the card size or shape is slightly different? That’s not a new product template it’s a duplicate with tiny cosmetic tweaks.

And this is exactly why so many creative products aren’t getting visibility or ranking. The marketplace is clogged with near‑duplicate listings in almost every category, and it makes it harder for customers to discover actual variety.

So, here’s the question I keep coming back to: Wouldn’t a simple algorithm update help clean this up?

Something like: Limit each design to one listing per category, and let editable templates handle size, card stock, and background changes and age. Customers still get full customization, but the marketplace isn’t buried under twenty versions of the same design.

Right now, the algorithm allows duplicates so of course people use the system as it exists. But is that really helping the marketplace?  But allowing something and it being good for the marketplace are two very different things.

Are you seeing the same thing? Do you think an update would help?

15 Likes
2

I agree. Based on my research, customers typically only view the first page of search results (and some customers only view first-page, above-the-fold results). More determined customers will typically only view the first 3-5 pages of search results before they bounce or try different search terms. When I get search results where the same design is offered repeatedly with minor revisions—designs that clog up search results, I walk away in frustration. And, as Susan pointed out, these unnecessary near-duplicate listings keep customers from being offered a variety of different products by different designers. This situation results in a loss of sales for both Zazzle and designers. If Zazzle could develop an algorithm to prevent this from happening, that would be great. Zazzle runs A/B testing in a lot of areas. This would be a great place to run such a test. That way, customer buying behavior would cast the deciding vote.

12 Likes
3

I think you summed it up well. The repetition we’re seeing isn’t just visual clutter it’s affecting how search results surface creative work. When the same design appears over and over with minor cosmetic changes, it dilutes variety and makes it harder for customers to find something by other creators.  An algorithmic adjustment could help restore balance without limiting customization. Templates already handle size, paper, and color variations; the issue is volume, not flexibility. A/B testing would be a smart way to measure whether reducing near‑duplicates improves engagement and sales. It’s encouraging to see others noticing the same trend. The marketplace works best when creativity, not repetition, drives visibility.

6 Likes
4

A few friends messaged me after I posted this and said this whole issue has actually been brought up before, and nothing really changed. The platform was updated in other areas, but the indexing glitch and the repetitive listings with the same title, description, and cluster tags were left sitting there, still clogging up the marketplace.

What I’ve learned since then is that this isn’t favoritism or anything like that. It’s more that this duplication method is being passed around as a “this is how you get your products seen” kind of strategy. It’s just creators sharing what they think works. And honestly, that explains why the same designs keep showing up twenty different times with tiny cosmetic changes while other creators end up buried on page 20. I brought up this topic again for those people who are doing everything right and still can’t get visibility.

The marketplace is so full of near‑identical listings that it’s affecting everyone, and it’s getting harder for creative work to surface. So much that it’s getting hard to ignore. I honestly have no idea if there’s an algorithum that could fix what’s going on… does anyone know if there is and wants to talk about it. @Jadendreamer13  @Veselka_Store  

2 Likes
5

I think customers also don’t appreciate that and are scrolling past over repetitive designs. 

5 Likes
6

I was chatting with my daughter about this ongoing Zazzle marketplace issue last night (she’s a computer software architect). She says that Zazzle could run a Jarowinkler Similarity algorithm to find products created by specific designers with similar titles to weed out spam postings (Zazzle would need to tweak this algorithm to search for repetitive designs by the same designer to keep it from flagging different products having the same or similar names by a variety of designers). And the best part of this suggested fix is that the above-mentioned algorithm already exists. It just needs to be tweaked to fit Zazzle’s needs.

If Zazzle is concerned enough about sales to redesign the design tool with ease of customer use in mind, then it should also be concerned about this issue and begin engineering solutions to unclog their marketplace.

I know this issue has been discussed before, and it will be discussed again until a reasonable solution is found.

This is an excellent, and much needed forum discussion. Thanks, Susan.

4 Likes
7

Just wanted to mention that Zazzle encourages the use of multiple colorways of our successful designs and created a Design Theme Tool to group our various product colors to allow the customer to see them all together and select the color they want. In order for the Design Theme Tool to work properly, the designs need to be identical (just different colors) or nearly identical. They instruct us to keep our titles descriptions and tags the same except for the color info. Otherwise, the algorithm will not group them properly and the creator will need to request Zazzle group their design colorways manually.  Here is Zazzle’s guidance on this topic: https://www.zazzle.com/hc/article/how_design_themes_are_created-360033801273
I understand your topic is much broader than just colorways, but I though it was important to note here what Zazzle has done with same product, same design in different colors in their effort to declutter the marketplace and show the customer color variations.

17 Likes
8

It’s actually encouraging to hear that this could be addressed with an existing algorithm and a few tweaks. That gives me hope that the fix isn’t as complicated as it sometimes feels. My only question is whether the Z‑team will actually implement something like this.

I say that because the designers who are using the repetitive‑listing method are earning well, and I’ve wondered if that income stream is part of why the issue hasn’t been addressed yet. I don’t know the answer, of course but I would hope that for the long‑term health of the platform, Zazzle would take steps to let all creative work surface instead of allowing repetitive listings to dominate. I think customers would appreciate that too.  Jill maybe tag heather so she can pass it along to the team about Jarowinkler Similarity algorithm.  

3 Likes
9

I understand the purpose of Design Themes, and yes the color circles underneath the product are great. Customers can already choose the color variation they want directly from the product page.

But that’s exactly why only one listing needs to appear in the marketplace. Right now, Zazzle is still showing every single color as a separate marketplace listing, and that’s what clogs the system.

Design Themes already solved the customer‑side color selection. The issue is that the marketplace is still being flooded with multiple colorway listings instead of grouping them under one main product.

2 Likes
10

Zazzle must consider a customer’s search terms. They search for a navy blue wedding invitation - it needs to appear in the results. The customer searching for an ivory wedding invitation needs their results to show that invitation as well. If only one is in the marketplace, the others might not get discovered. A customer needs to be able to see the color they search for. Then variations appear as other options. There is no main color. I believe the design themes algorithm takes all that into consideration.

13 Likes
11

While I understand trying to boot things like people who mass post ‘blank white products’ and such, I think dropping something like that into the algorithm could have huge negative consequences on legitimate items.  Given that there are only so many characters allowed into titles, it is quite possible that it would cause a high amount of ‘false positives’ and hide items that it wasn’t intended to. Which when I Googled that did come up as a known issue.  If we already have an issue with items getting indexed, I think this would likely add to it.  Adding more automation sounds terrifying to me, because what if you get stuck in the ‘trash bin’, there is no way to get your shop out because it’s not human.  

13 Likes
12

I think we may be talking past each other a bit, so let me clarify my point. Customers absolutely do search for specific colors  pink floral, blush, sage, cream, all of that matters. But that’s exactly why showing every single colorway as a separate marketplace listing becomes overwhelming.

as an example If someone searches for a pink floral wedding/birthday or whatever invitation, they expect to see a variety of pink floral designs created by different designers not 30 nearly identical pink floral invitations from the same designer, each one just a slight color variation. That’s where the clogged marketplace comes from.  The customer can still choose their preferred color once they click the product. The issue isn’t color availability it’s the volume of duplicate listings flooding the marketplace

2 Likes
13

I just searched for pink floral wedding invitation and the results were a page with a variety of designs from many different creators. Only saw a couple of dupes that showed one on card stock and one on acrylic of the same design. Nothing at all jumped out as spammy and there was lots of variety. Perhaps our individual searches are producing different results based on our own search habits.

9 Likes
14

I’m not comfortable sharing a link to a page full of repetitive products. It feels like an invasion of privacy, and it’s not about calling out any individual designer. Zazzle currently allows this, so people naturally use the system as it exists. But just to clarify my concern isn’t about one specific search term or one page of results. It’s the overall pattern across the marketplace. There are many categories where the results are heavily dominated by near-duplicate listings from the same designer, and that’s where the customer experience starts to break down. The issue isn’t color options or product variety it’s the volume of nearly identical listings flooding certain searches and pushing other creators’ work down. 

2 Likes
15

I get what you are frustrated about, but I don’t know how Zazzle can do this in a way that won’t negatively effect users across the board (both big and small creators). Customers do want various items with different elements. Even a small change may make the difference for a customer. Where one variation works for one person, another person may not click on that item at all because of that same element.  So how would the algorithm determine which one product variation is allowed to be seen in the market feed if they were to do this? Too many similar may be an issue visually in some results, but the opposite is also an issue.  At least with too many options, Zazzle offers filtering options, and customers can always add more keywords to their search to find the best match.  You cannot do the opposite when you have forcefully hidden large quantities of items from being found. They would essentially become invisible and not indexed. And then it’s an even bigger gamble you are taking when creating an item, because what if that one item that was allowed into the feed doesn’t hit the right search results, then all of those similar items and potentially any collection/matching items would be dead in the water too.

9 Likes
16

I understand wanting to give customers options, but when a designer moves a flower or element just a fraction of an inch, it makes me wonder if we’re assuming that’s what the customer might want. The reality is, we don’t actually know what a customer prefers unless they contact us and ask for that specific change. And most customers will reach out if they need something adjusted.

But the truth is, all those tiny little adjustments still look like the same artwork or the same template to most people. Like @Jadendreamer13  mentioned, ‘When I get search results where the same design is offered repeatedly with minor revisions—designs that clog up search results, I walk away in frustration.’ I think a lot of customers feel the same way.

So when dozens of micro‑variations show up in search results, it doesn’t feel like meaningful variety it just feels repetitive to the shopper. 

2 Likes
17

You’re assuming that a customer who searches, for example, for a “pink floral peony invitation,” and the search results display 6-10 near-identical designs will try different search terms. But they have already entered a description of the exact product they are looking for, so they won’t bother to search again. They will most likely bounce off of Zazzle and look for something on a different platform. So, in this case, over-saturating the marketplace won’t result in more sales for Zazzle or designers. Most of us agree that the marketplace is overrun with nearly identical designs and that site indexing is often slow and problematic as a result, so why not let Zazzle’s engineers come up with a solution/solutions that address these problems? And why not let Zazzle run A/B testing to see if weeding out duplicate designs improves overall sales? And why not let customer buying behavior help shape the solution? Doing nothing out of fear that there will need to be an adjustment (there always is) won’t resolve issues like this. If nothing is done, then nothing will change.

4 Likes
18

I think color variations have been efficiently handled with the “colorways” swatches provided with the thumbs in the MP that make it easy to see and select another color the Designer has offered. 
This pillow, I got carried away and made it in eight different color themes. A generic search (no color specified) brings up just one of the eight pillows, with the swatches on it. If I include a color in my search, it brings up just the one in that specific color, with the swatches for the others on it. I believe this approach has been very effective at reducing repetitive clutter in the MP. But there are two other design/publishing situations still negatively effecting the MP both for customers browsing and designers hoping to be seen. 

One is when the Designer chooses to use flattened text as part of the image instead of using editable template text. There are legit reasons for doing this but when the same design is then published multiple times with only that flattened text being different, it gets out of hand. Going to have to get a little wordy here to avoid linking to an actual search results example … If I search for two particular keywords plus product type, the results are dominated by one design of this nature (exact same graphic but different flattened text on it).  There are 60 results on a page.
Page One - 39 of 60 are this same design (65%!)
Page Two - 19 of 60 (32%)
Page Three - 3 of 60
Page Four - 8 of 60
Page Five - 2 of 60
And every other page of the results thru last page 16 has more of this same design scattered on it. 
ONE design is taking up 65% of the first page of results - and thus displacing 38 others from showing there. 
Across the first five pages, this one design makes up a quarter of all results. 
And that is just the most egregious offender; there are multiple other design repeats in this same search.
For this type of repeat design, I feel like there should be a solution similar to how colorways work; they should be grouped together somehow so that only one version of it appears in the MP with the rest being linked.

The other situation that needs addressing is publishing the same design on the different options a customer can easily choose for themselves on the product page, as for example, polyester, cotton, outdoor, zipperless … for pillows. Or what I see even more often is the same design on every variety of shirt offered, hoody, mens t, womens t, basic t, long sleeve, short sleeve, sweatshirt …  I think some Designers do this out of ignorance, they don’t understand that the customer can choose these options for themselves so it’s unnecessary, But I also think some Designers do it on purpose for more exposure. Whether due to ignorance or intent, this is a practice I think Zazzle needs to put a stop to. I don’t know how they’d do it, but the system shouldn’t allow it to happen. 

The gray area is publishing same design on same product but with different size and/or shape options selected. Sometimes they are so drastically different that one design simply can’t work for all shapes & sizes so one might chose to publish separately, design tweaked for each specific size/shape. This should be allowed, but again, we need something similar to “colorways” so that only one version shows in the MP with the rest linked. This is a gray area because sometimes people publish separately at different size options when not at all necessary, like say publishing at both 16x16 and 20x20 for a pillow. Not sure how any “algorithm” could tell the difference between multiple size options that are necessary for design integrity and those that aren’t. 

And another repeat-design issue - things like shoes and shirts where you have to choose mens or womens as a department. This encourages people to publish the same design multiple times so they can put it in each one. We really really need Unisex to be default department on such products, and then, and only if the Designer wants to, they can add Mens or Womens as a sub-filter. 

I don’t think there is any one cookie-cutter solution since the reasons for repeat designs are multiple, but the repetitiveness in the MP is definitely a problem and has been for a long time. I agree with everyone else that it’s a turn-off for shoppers, it pushes alternative designs down which is bad for both shoppers and Designers, and it makes the whole platform look same same same boring when the reality is there are tens of thousands of very unique designs. 

14 Likes
19

My designs featuring various colorways are shown just as @ColsCreations   mentioned. Only one version can be found in the MP with swatches displayed below. Occasionally, the Zazzle “grouping” has not included all the colors, or the grouping algorithm has an issue, resulting in all of them appearing for a while.

For all those other repetitive designs cluttering the MP, I completely agree that it’s a real turn-off for shoppers and bad for designers. Something needs to be done. Even if just one person dedicated one day a week to browse the MP and eliminate the most glaring issues, it would certainly make a difference!

3 Likes
20

Lots of those duplicates are caused by customers when ask to move this element a bit left, change slightly flower size, from gold to silver etc,  then you publish the product and since it got a sale, so you dont want to delete it, plus it’s what customer wants and you keep it.

8 Likes