Right up front let me say that yes, I know this is petty, it's "only" 1 cent. I'd probably never have noticed something like this - except it was (an extremely rare for me) self referred sale and I'd been playing around with the math, had made some screenshots. (Please note that the amount for self referral in other areas was $3.99 and is still 3.99. On the royalty breakdown page the amount still shows as $1.69, it only seems to have changed on the royalty history report...)
The only different I spot is it looks like the $1.69 royalty may have been before the updated earnings reporting but I'd think that shouldn't have changed any already computed amounts...... so where did that 1 cent go, why and how? Has anyone else seen this? Again, I know it's only a penny, but these days pennies add up.
Rounding would certainly have an effect on the initial computations but the 'breakdown' report showed and still shows $1.69, the same as when it initially posted to the Royalty History. What confuses me is why it changed to $1.68 from $1.69 on the Royalty History well after the initial computations/reporting. If this was from rounding up or down I'd think that would have been done prior to $1.69 being listed as royalty everywhere then changing but only on the Royalty History page. Sorry to sound dense but this heatwave is about to melt my already taxed brain. 😞
Yup! I noticed that too
Here is what it shows
and this is what is being shown in details section
