Get Indexed Faster with This Show Me Meta Description Hack

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

 

When you’re sharing products through Show Me, that short line of text you add works just like a meta description. It gives Zazzle and Google a clear idea of what your product is, who it’s for, and why it matters. I learned this approach years ago when I published for eHow.com, and the same principle applies everywhere online: a natural, human sentence helps search engines understand your content instead of guessing from the image alone.

(it's not immediate indexing it takes about 60 days to be Green) 

When content writers say a new post takes up to 60 days to be “green” in SEO, they’re talking about the time it takes for a new piece of content to be fully indexed, optimized, and stable enough to start ranking in organic search results. “Green” is professional shorthand for “performing well,” and it comes from SEO tools like Yoast and Rank Math that use red, orange, and green indicators to show optimization quality. The idea is the same here: give your content time to settle, then check where it’s landing in search.

Adding a simple meta‑style sentence to your Show Me shares strengthens your SEO footprint, improves visibility, and can lead to more traffic and potential sales. It’s an easy step that works quietly in the background, but it makes a noticeable difference over time.

Post published by Susang6
My Zazzle store:

an example of meta tag added to show me sharean example of meta tag added to show me share

31 REPLIES 31

Fantabuloustef
Valued Contributor

I think you’re right, generally search engines prefer natural text and index it well, but I’m quite unsure about the indexation of the show me forum category here. The reason is that I already found different posts of other categories in the Zazzle forum through searching google, but I never found results pertaining to the Show Me section. Search engines are also very sensitive to posts looking spammy or too repetitive with a huge quantity of similar content without a lot of conversational content ( as you mentioned) , so, maybe google just don’t index this part of the site. ( But I’m quite unsure it would change if we add more natural text now. ) 

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

 

 

if you search “Show Me wall art decor for walls” on Google, you’ll see my Show Me posts indexed, along with my boards under my username Susang6. That’s why I’m certain the category can be indexed. Google just doesn’t surface most of it because the majority of Show Me posts have no text at all, so they look repetitive and low‑value to the crawler.

When you add even one natural sentence, it gives Google something to interpret, the same way ALT text does for images. That’s the only difference between the Show Me posts of mine that appear in search and the ones that don’t.

So you’re right Google is selective. But it’s not blocking the category. It’s simply choosing the posts that have enough context to understand.

If you want, I can show you the exact snippets Google is pulling from my indexed Show Me posts so you can compare what it picked up.

I actually took a screenshot of my footprint the other day, and it shows my “Show Me Your Wall Art” show me  board...I posted  125 character ALT image or Meta texts to my shares and it  helped with indexing.   It is not spammy. If its done professionally  SEO index of group where I add Alt image text or Meta text to my posts.SEO index of group where I add Alt image text or Meta text to my posts.

 

footprint shows meta text or image ALT text is allowing Show me posts to be indexed.footprint shows meta text or image ALT text is allowing Show me posts to be indexed.

I tried  from here, and it doesn’t give me the same results, but it’s maybe because I’m browsing from France. Even though my browser is in English, my geographical parameters are not in the USA, ( else it would be too complex to manage for my everyday use of the browser)  .
It’s good news then. I will have to write more qualitative text for my next posts in the Show me forum. 

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

My post was about indexing, not ranking. The screenshots I shared showed the Show Me page already indexed . You won’t see the same results I do because my Chrome search is personalized  I have a huge footprint under “Susang6,” so Google connects all my blogs, my store, and my older content to my name. Show Me boards are low in the ranking, so all brand and high‑authority keywords will always rank before them. You know ranking and indexing are not the same thing, and depending on how Google interprets the query, it may even treat it as a shopping search. That’s why everyone’s results will look different, but the indexing itself is already confirmed.

Yes, I know it very well from my former professional life. 
But being indexed without a good ranking in the search results won’t  attract many people to our products. This is the finality for me. ( and that’s why we diverge a little bit from your initial subject) And it will be possible only with first being indexed, but also a mix of a good site and page authority and the quality of the content we publish ( as you clearly mentioned in your initial post with the need for natural text description   ) . 
I didn’t check in moz or other tools, but for sure, if the page authority score is already very bad, our efforts to publish quality content could be disproportionate to the possible reachable results. 
But you're right , it’s a first step to know without any possible doubt that the “show me” posts are indexed.

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

Before the noise on our landing page was added I could find all of my products in the SEO indexed, after the noise I could not,  I know  that even with a strong description, tags, title that the noise on the page is so much that when the bots crawl they cannot read the page , so no index of our product nothing,  that  too could be affecting sales,  the only way I see any of my products in SEO is when something is sponsored or Pinterest Facebook adds, but  they mostly add my product reviews,   Overall everything Zazzle does for customer conversion seems to hurt the creator.   Index is good, then bots look for organic backlinks which I have shared that board on pinterest and gave it an organic backlink from my blog, not enough to rank it but I think we all have to start backlinking our products and adding meta tags to try to boost our products, doing nothing, creates more no sales in my opinion.  Maybe I am being desperate because sales are off ...do you have any better ideas ?  just trying to help, sometimes my ideas are good for all sometimes they aren't 

It’s a very huge work to build a full seo strategy and follow up the results, compare with competitors, adapt the strategy to rank better, I would say it’s a full-time job, and it’s especially difficult nowadays because the search engines algorithms are constantly and quickly evolving, and the AI makes it always more difficult.
I used to follow a blog called “seo by the sea”, many years ago. Its owner was doing an incredible work following and reading all Google patents and allowing his followers to understand them and their impacts on seo strategy a little better, and for me, it was already a very huge work, just to follow him.
I stopped following these topics many years ago, so, I couldn’t give any good advice for today.

But it can be quite complex for sure, sometimes we absolutely want to rank better, get backlinks and so on, and we end up with penalties because it also links our reputation to other sites reputation. So, for now, I just try to focus on my designs and try to genuinely promote my products, and it’s already enough work for me at the moment. 

I know it’s not the best recipe for success, I know it could be better, but I didn’t want to restart the same job again, my interest goes now in the creation. ( And I don’t want to put money into promoting, investing my money brings me more benefits for sure. )

And I admire your patience and dedication to learn more on these subjects and follow all the Zazzle changes impacts on your SEO and so on. ( and share with everybody here )

I never had big success on Zazzle, so, I guess I’m less desperate because I didn’t expected much from the start, I started with a context already difficult and a very huge competition… However, when they remove functional tools and destroy their advantages, it goes a little bit on my nerves ! 😊

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

You’re right that SEO is a huge amount of work, and most creators don’t have the time to build a full strategy. I’m not trying to game anything I just come from a background where SEO was part of the job. When I wrote for eHow, all writers had to learn SEO, and later at Demand Media we had to take actual classes. I’ve also been the admin/architect on an AI tech/SEO blog for the last 17 years, so I’m still learning daily through research.

That’s why I look at things a little differently. Algorithms may be more complex now, but they still rely on keywords and clean page structure to understand what a page is about. When a product page has too much noise, the bots can’t read it clearly. If they can’t read it, they don’t index it  and without indexing, nothing ranks. That’s the part that concerns me.

And just to clarify, there’s nothing wrong with backlinking. Organic backlinks are actually recommended. They’re not a violation, and they don’t cause penalties unless someone is buying links or using spammy sites. Sharing a Pinterest board or linking from a personal blog is normal, healthy SEO. I’m not sure where the idea of penalties came from, because you mentioned backlinks in your own comment too.

My question is simply: what happens if creators do nothing? If our pages aren’t being indexed because of the clutter, and we don’t promote or backlink anything, then our products just sit there unseen. That’s why I try to share what I’ve learned  not because I expect miracles, but because doing nothing seems worse.

I appreciate your perspective, and I agree that focusing on creation matters too. I’m just comparing notes in case anything I’ve learned helps someone else.

I try to answer your points quickly :

- Yes, they still rely on keywords but not only, the AI has added a complementary deep semantic analysis dimension.

- Backlinks are still important today but the AI systems  are much more selective on the quality of the links , relevance and authority of the site  …. ( Creating content that is link‑worthy (guides, data, visuals, tools) is more effective than chasing links.) Google has become extremely good at filtering out low‑quality or manipulative links. A handful of strong, relevant backlinks can outperform hundreds of weak ones. 
My point about penalties was more to alert people that it’s not a backlinks competition ( today less than ever with the use of AI ) , quality and authenticity of backlinks is more important than ever. ( and manual penalties can still occur for clear violations like  
paid links, link exchanges, link farms, private blog networks, large-scale directory or forum spam …)

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

I want to respond to your points, because I’m honestly not sure why the conversation keeps circling back to spam, penalties, or violations. Nothing I’ve said has anything to do with manipulative links, paid links, or anything that would violate Google’s guidelines. I have never paid for a link, never suggested it, and I do NOT recommend it.

“Yes, they still rely on keywords but not only…”
I agree. Google uses semantic analysis, entity recognition, and contextual layers. That part isn’t in question. My point was simply that if Zazzle’s product pages are cluttered or broken, the bots can’t read any of it clearly no matter how advanced the algorithm is. Page noise still interferes with indexing.

“Backlinks are still important but AI is more selective…”
Absolutely. And again, I’m only talking about organic backlinks Pinterest, my own blog, normal sharing. Those are standard, safe SEO signals. Nothing manipulative.

“Google filters out low‑quality or manipulative links…”
Of course it does. But I’m not using manipulative links, and I’m not advising anyone to do that. I’ve been beta‑testing with Google since 2009, and I always attach my name to every test. I’m extremely careful about compliance. I would never suggest anything that violates Google’s rules.

“My point about penalties was to alert people…”
I understand that, but I’m not sure why penalties keep being brought up in response to what I said. Nothing I’m doing or suggesting is even remotely close to spam, link schemes, or anything that would trigger a manual action. Organic backlinks from your own platforms are not violations.

“Paid links, link exchanges, link farms, PBNs, forum spam…”
This is where I’m getting lost. I haven’t mentioned or recommended any of those things. That’s not what I’m talking about at all. I’m talking about Zazzle’s technical issues  page noise, glitches, slow updates  that interfere with indexing before SEO even enters the picture.

And regarding the Show Me posts:
The short descriptive line I add at the top of a Show Me share is not manipulative, not spam, and not a violation. It’s simply a natural description of the product  the same kind of descriptive text Google has always encouraged so crawlers can understand what an image or page contains. It’s no different from ALT text, which is a standard accessibility practice and a normal SEO signal. It’s not paid, it’s not exchanged, it’s not part of a link scheme, and it’s not intended to manipulate anything. It’s just giving the bots something readable on a page that would otherwise be nothing but an image.

So I’m genuinely confused why the discussion keeps drifting toward spam and penalties when nothing I’ve said relates to that. My concern is the platform itself: if Zazzle’s pages aren’t readable by bots, then even perfect SEO won’t help. That’s the issue I’m trying to address.

For clarity, Google does not consider organic backlinks from your own platforms such as a personal blog, Pinterest board, or social media to be manipulative or a violation. Google’s Search Essentials explicitly encourage natural sharing, descriptive text, and normal linking as part of how the web works. The only backlinks that violate Google’s policies are manipulative ones, such as paid links, link exchanges, automated spam, link farms, or private blog networks created solely to inflate rankings. None of that applies to what I’m doing nor have I recommend.  A private blog used in a normal way is not a violation, and organic backlinks are completely allowed.

I didn’t read till the end because it’s a little bit long, but I agree on all the points where you highlighted what I told just before.
I didn't mean to imply that you were suggesting ways to get bad backlinks. I just want everyone to be well-informed about the constraints and limitations associated with their use. (I don't want anyone to think, "Oh yes, my god, backlinks are important, I absolutely have to get loads of them," and then start using the wrong methods to do so, that's all.)

And, sorry if you felt it was a personal attack, it wasn't. My level of English also doesn't always allow me to express perfectly and unambiguously what I want to say, because I don't practice it very often anymore with native speakers in my daily life. 

With that, I'm going to bed because it's midnight here and I'm exhausted.
Have a nice day ! ( or end of day ? Sorry I’m too tired for the time zones calculations ) 😉

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

I wasn’t taking anything as a personal attack, just trying to keep the discussion focused on what I actually said. The conversation drifted into penalties, spam, and manipulative backlinks, and none of that was part of my point. Most creators here don’t have SEO backgrounds, so they wouldn’t even know what a link farm is, or how to buy bot views, or how to get involved in the kinds of violations you were describing. Those are things only someone with prior SEO knowledge would even be aware of. I was only talking about Zazzle’s technical issues and how page noise affects indexing, not anything related to violations. In any case, I think we’ve both said what we needed to say, so I’m fine leaving it here. 

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

I was actually going to share what I know about pinging, because it’s one of the simplest ways to help search engines discover new links faster. But I’m getting the feeling that a lot of creators want to be indexed, want to rank, want first‑page visibility without doing any of the work that goes into it. Just saying.

 I won’t bring up pinging here. I’ll just keep that information to myself or publish it on my AI/tech SEO blog where readers actually want to learn and understand the process.

I’m doing the minimum for this one, pinging new pages of my website when I create some.

I tried what you said, and I have to ask are you sure you're not being shown personalized search results that look at what pages you browse and with interact with to give you those results? This is what I get from Google as of 3 minutes ago with your prompt, much like FantabulousStef it just doesn't come up for us the way it does for you.

 

 

image.png

The best way to be sure is generally to clean the browser cache, remove cookies and browsing history before trying, but I supposes it’s what Susang6 did ?

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

this is what I got  for search > Show me wall art decor for your walls.  Show Me posts are low‑authority forum pages, so they will never outrank Pinterest, Etsy, Amazon, or decor blogs for broad shopping terms like “wall art decor for your walls.” That has nothing to do with indexing.
My post shares tips on how to help Google index their Show Me posts faster by adding a natural, human sentence  not how to make them rank #1 for competitive decor keywords.  All of my screenshots show that my Zazzle show me board is indexed. 

Yes, my search results are personal  I have a huge footprint for “Susang6” in Chrome because Google knows me and connects all my blogs, my store, and my older content to my name. That’s why I see so much more than anyone else. If you search “Susang6,” your results won’t look like mine because yours aren’t personalized.  But again, my post wasn’t about ranking  it was about indexing.

 

show me wall art decor for your wallsshow me wall art decor for your walls

Jadendreamer13
Honored Contributor II

Ok, I’m understanding this now. I don’t know why that concept was so difficult for me to grasp. Duh!

Jadendreamer13
Honored Contributor II

Do you mean a short text description, and not the post title? Are both of those areas a good place to add SEO-rich descriptors? I don’t ever use the Show Me forum. I’m not really sure what purpose it’s used for. Maybe I’m missing out on a good tool….

I’m all ears.

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

Yes on Show Me you only get the product image and the product title. There’s no description field there. That’s why adding one short, natural sentence in your post text works so well. It gives Zazzle and Google context they can’t get from the image alone.

It works a lot like image ALT text. ALT text is usually kept under about 125 characters because screen readers handle that range cleanly, and it forces you to write one clear, human sentence. The Show Me line follows the same idea short, descriptive, and helpful for search engines.

Here’s an example of ALT text for my daffodil woodland image (113 characters):
Spring woodland with yellow daffodils blooming under tall trees and pink flowering branches.

Between your product title, your ALT text or Meta description text , and image at Show Me sentence, you’re creating multiple consistent signals that all point to the same thing. That’s what strengthens SEO over time. And just like any new content online, it takes around 60 days for a listing to fully settle and show as “green” in SEO tools.

It’s a tiny step, but it quietly improves visibility and helps your products land where they belong in search.

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

Example Meta or Alt textExample Meta or Alt text

MOM
Valued Contributor III

@Fantabuloustef  Google also loves videos. That’s why I used to post often to the „Show Me“ boards in the past using a short video. It takes just a couple of days for those to pop up on Google and I‘m simply searching for my Zazzle title to find those listings on Google (I‘m in the Bay Area). In recent months I have tired a bit of promoting my designs so I don’t do it that often anymore. But I usually visit your listing if I do and yours comes up in the same page. 🙂

San FranciscoRSSSan FranciscoBenableBlueskyFacebookflickrInstagramLinkedinPinterestRedditTikTokThreadsvimeoXYouTube

Fantabuloustef
Valued Contributor

Good to know ! Thank you ! 

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

@MOM Google definitely indexes videos, but only when they’re on a proper video page like YouTube where the system can read the title, description, tags, and structured data. Google can’t “read” a video by itself  bots can’t watch a clip and understand what it’s about without text wrapped around it.

That’s why Google still loves content more than anything else. Text is what tells the bots what your page is about. A video is optional, but a description is mandatory. Without written content, Google has nothing to latch onto.

And I’m curious about something you mentioned you said you’ve only been a creator for 3 years. The ability to upload short videos to the Show Me boards was removed about eight years ago when the community platform was updated. I do remember the tiny video clips in the old Show Me, but the new community doesn’t have any video upload or embed option at all.

So I’m wondering: have you found a way to add a video to the current Show Me boards? Because as far as I know, that feature hasn’t existed in many years.

Probably through editing the html directly, if you host your video on a publicly reachable location it shouldn’t be a problem. And you can put an alt text on it.
‘For the non-crawling of video content for indexation, I’m not so sure. I followed a SEO advanced training about ten years ago for my former job and at the time they were already saying that big progress was ongoing in the domain and they would be soon able to index image and video content. As the search engines integrate more and more AI capabilities, I won’t be surprised to know that they are able to index ( at least partially ) some data in the video content. 

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

@Fantabuloustef I wish we could edit HTML on Show Me, but the current platform doesn’t allow any HTML access at all. The “HTML”  for show me product shares is just the editor’s link tool, which only lets us wrap a URL around an image. It’s not real code, and  or  tags don’t work. I even tried it myself to add a video no luck. If you want to test it too, we can confirm it together.

We can upload videos through the Media Manager, but those only appear on product pages or storefront settings. They don’t carry over to Show Me, because the boards don’t support video uploads or embeds of any kind.  

When you click on html at the right of the top bar you can see all the html code snippet from your post and modify it. I make it often to change the image sizes when posting for example. 
I just tried with the html5 video tag , everything is ok before pressing the post. Or reply button, my video starts, but when I press the button it says that invalid html code has been detected and remove it. So it’s intentional from Zazzle side to not allow videos. But maybe MOM was just talking about animated gifs… 

MOM
Valued Contributor III

@Fantabuloustef Sorry, I was napping a bit and just came back now to the conversation. I get that darn warning all the time, even when I use the HTML code provided by Zazzle straight. That’s not it. In previous times I usually used video files, just the last couple of times I used GIFs. As I said, I‘m not so motivated right now to go the extra mile (I should actually be working on my tax return instead of reading Zazzle boards, lol).

San FranciscoRSSSan FranciscoBenableBlueskyFacebookflickrInstagramLinkedinPinterestRedditTikTokThreadsvimeoXYouTube

Fantabuloustef
Valued Contributor

Yes, the warning is displayed in other cases, but in my case with  the <video> tag , it removed the opening and closing tag and also all the code between them , I checked. So there’s a real checking and removal from their side. 

 

I’ll test tomorrow with a real video, I tried an embed from a canva  video I did and it does not work, but with the video tag in the html it may work.

Susang6
Valued Contributor III

Really a couple days?  are you pinging your link, But even pinging it takes longer than  few days... to be indexed... 

From Google Search documentation:
“It can take anywhere from a few days to several weeks for a new page to be crawled and indexed. We can’t guarantee that all pages will be indexed, and we don’t guarantee how long it will take. The speed depends on many factors, including the quality of the content and how easy it is for us to understand the page.”

That’s why I tell creators to allow about 60 days for a new Zazzle product to fully settle into search. Thin pages with short descriptions are always slower Google needs real content to work with.